From Art Images to Instagram Content: Modes of Image Actualization and Genre Configurations in Muklay’s Visual Practice

Rifki Aswan; Bambang Sugiharto; Samuel Gandang Gunanto; Jenny Ratna Ika

doi:10.55927/ijis.v5i10.91

Authors

Rifki Aswan Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta
Bambang Sugiharto Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Samuel Gandang Gunanto Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta
Jenny Ratna Ika Universitas Negeri Makassa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v5i10.91

Keywords:

Art Images, Image Actualization, Virtual Ethnography, Instagram, Machinic Assemblage, Content Genres, Indonesian Visual Art.

Abstract

On Instagram, artworks circulate as images configured as records of artistic production, markers of identity, commodities, experiences of events, and resources for user interaction. This study identifies modes of art-image actualization and examines how their relational arrangements contribute to genre configurations in Muklay’s Instagram practice. It adopts a qualitative approach combining virtual ethnography, visual content analysis, and relational interpretation informed by the concept of machinic assemblage. Nine selected posts (2023–2025) are examined at the levels of individual scenes and complete posts, with prosumer documentation providing supplementary contextual evidence. The findings identify six potentially overlapping modes: Artwork Image, Process Image, Lifestyle Image, Commodity Image, Event Image, and Social Image. Cross-case comparisons demonstrate how similar image modes participate in different genre configurations. Documentation of artistic processes, for example, may foreground creative labor or support branded communication, while artworks situated in domestic and exhibition settings acquire distinct narrative and communicative functions. These configurations emerge through relations among artistic activities, material objects, bodies, audiovisual conventions, and platform affordances rather than through image types or technical formats alone. The study proposes a relational image–function–genre framework that explains how art images are organized into Instagram content, with its conclusions limited to the documented cases.

References

Agrawal, A., Sharma, D., Mishra, M. K., Shah, M. A., Alam, M., & Khandelwal, V. (2024). How to cook a meme: Exploring content strategies in brand and user-generated memes on Instagram. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2366001. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2366001

Aristidou, M., & Stylianou-Lambert, T. (2024). VR/AR artworks in the museum: Redefining preservation through collaboration. Convergence, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241261995

Aswan, R. (2026). Visi estetik seni di Instagram: Reteritorialisasi kesadaran estetik melalui citra seni Muklay [An aesthetic vision of art on Instagram: The reterritorialization of aesthetic consciousness through Muklay’s art images] [Unpublished dissertation research manuscript; working document dated 12 October 2026]. Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta.

Bainotti, L., Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2021). From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram Stories with digital methods. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3656–3676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960071

Bishop, S. (2025). Influencer creep: How artists strategically navigate the platformisation of art worlds. New Media & Society, 27(4), 2109–2126. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231206090

Booth, P., & Røyseng, S. (2022). Artists and online dissemination: An analysis of positions and position-takings. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(4), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2022.2034691

Bosello, G., & van den Haak, M. (2022). #Arttothepeople? An exploration of Instagram’s unfulfilled potential for democratising museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 37(6), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.2023905

Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE.

Caliandro, A., & Anselmi, G. (2021). Affordances-based brand relations: An inquire on memetic brands on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021367

Carah, N., Brown, M.-G., & Hickman, S. (2023). Optimizing looking and buying on Instagram: Tracing the platformization of advertising and retail on mobile social media. Television & New Media, 24(4), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221123033

DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)

Derda, I. (2024). Museum exhibition co-creation in the age of data: Emerging design strategy for enhanced visitor engagement. Convergence, 30(5), 1596–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231174597

franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf

Hietala, I. (2023). Nurturing an aesthetic tribe: Consuming and (re)producing “Quarantine Art”. Marketing Theory, 23(2), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221138613

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.

Holcombe-James, I., Flore, J., & Hendry, N. A. (2024). Digital arts and culture in Australia: Promissory discourses and uncertain realities in pandemic times. Media International Australia, 192(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221136922

Hutchinson, J. (2023). Digital intermediation: Unseen infrastructures for cultural production. New Media & Society, 25(12). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211040247

Komarac, T., & Ozretić Došen, Đ. (2024). Understanding virtual museum visits: Generation Z experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 39(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2023.2269129

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Laukkanen, H. (2025). Artists as cultural intermediaries: How professional artists present their work on homepages and Instagram accounts. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 55(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2025.2467105

Lee, J. W., & Lee, S. H. (2023). The legitimation of young and emerging artists in digital platforms: The case of Saatchi Art. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 53(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2022.2080136

Lomborg, S. (2014). Social media, social genres: Making sense of the ordinary. Routledge.

Marini, C., & Agostino, D. (2022). Humanized museums? How digital technologies become relational tools. Museum Management and Curatorship, 37(6), 598–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.1969677

Piancatelli, C., Massi, M., & Vocino, A. (2021). #artoninstagram: Engaging with art in the era of the selfie. International Journal of Market Research, 63(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320963526

Razzaq, A., Shao, W., & Quach, S. (2023). Towards an understanding of meme marketing: Conceptualisation and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing Management, 39(7–8), 670–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2158906

Rhee, B.-A., Pianzola, F., & Choi, G.-T. (2021). Analyzing the museum experience through the lens of Instagram posts. Curator: The Museum Journal, 64(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12414

Rhee, B.-A., Pianzola, F., Choi, J., Hyung, W., & Hwang, J. (2022). Visual content analysis of visitors’ engagement with an instagrammable exhibition. Museum Management and Curatorship, 37(6), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.2023902

Rogers, R. (2021). Visual media analysis for Instagram and other online platforms. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211022370

Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (5th ed.). SAGE.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.

Soronen, A., & Koivunen, A. (2022). Platformed intimacies: Professional belonging on social media. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221079854

Suess, A., & Barton, G. (2022). Instagram and the museum experience: Theorising the connection through aesthetics, space and sharing. Museum Management and Curatorship, 37(6), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2022.2073563

Turvy, A. (2023). Potholes and power: A multimodal critical discourse analysis of “Look at this fckin’ street” on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231194580

Turvy, A. (2025). Comparing TikTok and Instagram’s sociotechnical environments for cultural production. Platforms & Society, 2, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624251359796

Valtýsson, B. (2022). Museums in the age of platform giants: Disconnected policies and practices. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221079649

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001

Vicari, S., & Kirby, D. (2023). Digital platforms as socio-cultural artifacts: Developing digital methods for cultural research. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1733–1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027498

Villanueva, I. I., Li, N., Jilk, T., Renner, J., Van Matre, B. R., & Brossard, D. (2024). When science meets art on Instagram: Examining the effects of visual art on emotions, interest, and social media engagement. Science Communication, 46(2), 210–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470241228279